How do politicians use history today in Bulgaria Essay -- Bulgarian Hi

From 1945 until 1989 Bulgaria had followed with consistency the same foreign policy pedigree of attachment to the Soviet Union and the Eastern Block, gaining the reputation of the most true-blue ally/satellite of the Soviet Union in Eastern atomic number 63 (*1) . The countrys given position in the international ashes was unchallenged, as was the dominant ideology (communism) that defined Bulgarias regime. After November 1989 however, and the primeval geopolitical changes that started to take place throughout Eastern Europe, Bulgaria too entered in an era of full-scale political and economic transformation. The end of the Cold War, the disbandment of the capital of Poland Pact in 1990 and the termination of Bulgarias close relations with the Soviet Union in 1991, meant in addition the loss of all the political, diplomatical and military advantages that the country had enjoyed since 1945 as otherwise former members of the Eastern Block, Bulgaria had to dominate a juvenile role and to create new alliances in the new geopolitical situation prevailing in Europe (*2) . Thus, Bulgaria had no other choice, after 1989, than to turn towards the due west. All Bulgarias political forces were unanimous nearly the need to improve and develop the countrys relations with the West (*3) . Even the Bulgarian Socialist Party (BSP), the former communists, who had maintained military force after the first democratic elections in 1990, agreed in that (*4) .II. join the EUII.1. From the outset of relations with the European Community until the Helsinki meridian (1988 1999)The signing of a Joint Declaration for establishing diplomatic relations mingled with the European Community (EC) and the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance (CMEA), in June 1988, is broadly speaking regarded as the beginnin... ...position was strengthened even more. The European Summit in Helsinki, in December 1999, decided to take up Bulgaria to open accession negotiations with the EU in Februa ry 2000. Although the European Council recognized the important progress that Bulgaria had made fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria , the decision to invite Sofia to begin negotiations was to a large extend a political decision. Firstly, because succeeding(a) the events in former Yugoslavia, there was growing concern that the whole area could be destabilized, and there was a need to support countries like Bulgaria and Romania, which was to a fault invited to begin accession negotiations in February 2000 . The second reason had to do with Frances insistence to invite Romania. From the moment that Romania had been invited, it would have been highly insulting to Bulgaria to conduct it outside and not to invite it .